Senate Rejects Senator Natasha’s Alleged Sexual Harassment Petition

The Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, on Wednesday, declared the petition on alleged sexual harassment filed by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP) against Senate President Godswill Akpabio as “dead on arrival.”

The Chairman of the committee, Senator Neda Imaseun (LP-Edo), made this statement during an investigative hearing on petitions related to alleged misconduct by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and allegations of sexual harassment against Senator Akpabio.

During Wednesday’s plenary, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan had announced her petition, read it aloud, and submitted it, with Senator Akpabio accepting it.

“I have a petition against the President of the Nigerian Senate, His Excellency Senator Godswill Akpabio, for sexual harassment, abuse of office and malicious obstruction of my legislative functions,” she said.

“You may recall, sir, that on Friday, during an Arise TV interview, I made certain statements. I have now decided to formalise those statements in a petition against the president of this senate.

“So, if it pleases you, I will humbly step forward and lay this petition.”

However, a heated debate ensued when Senate Chief Whip, Senator Mohammed Monguno, citing Order 40(4), argued that Senate rules must be strictly followed.

Order 40(4) states: “No senator may present to the Senate a petition signed by himself.”

 

Read Also: Senate President Denies Sexual Harassment Allegations

Sexual Harassment: Supporters of Senator Natasha Take Protest To NASS

 

Senator Monguno warned that any deviation from the rules could lead to “chaos and anarchy” and emphasised the senate’s duty to uphold its procedural integrity.

He further noted that the matter was already sub judice, as Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan had taken the case to court.

“And also, the wife of the senate president has equally gone to court in respect of this matter. So, this matter is sub judiced.

”Therefore, the senate does not have to do anything to entertain this matter,” he said.

He advised that the matter should be referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions.

In his remarks, the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio said “the Senate actually referred her matter not because I’m not aware of the provisions of the rules. It is because when people are watching from outside, they may not know we are guided by rules”.

 

‘Dead on arrival’

Senator Imaseun at the investigative hearing after plenary said:

“It is the procedure of this committee, as a matter of fact, the first thing we ask when the petition comes to us is whether or not that petition is before any law court.

”And if the answer is yes, we do not touch such petitions.

“In addition to that, our Red Book also, under Order 40, has also laid down the processes that must be followed before a petition is laid.

“If you allow me, Order 40 of our rulebook, subsection 4, says that no senator may present to the Senate a petition signed by him or herself.

”In other words, I cannot submit a petition about myself, signed by myself, that petition ought to be presented by another senator.

“And I’m sure that there are three senators from Kogi, as it is with other states, and that was not done.

“That report, we will not even touch it because it’s a matter before the court.

“We do not place much emphasis on this order that was presented. We are referring back to our rulebook. As I said earlier, the petition she submitted today is ‘dead on arrival.’

“I say this because it directly contradicts Order 40, Subsection 4, which states that no senator may present a petition in the Senate that is signed by themselves.

“Since the petition was signed by her, this committee will not entertain it”.

 

‘Disorderly conduct’

The committee had earlier launched an investigation into the alleged disorderly conduct of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan during the plenary session on Feb. 20.

The senate had referred a petition, presented by its spokesperson, Senator Yemi Adaramodu (APC-Ekiti), to the committee on Feb. 25, mandating it to submit its report within two weeks.

The petition stemmed from the controversy surrounding a recent altercation between Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership over seat allocation.

Present at the hearing to make presentations were the petition’s author, Senator Adaramodu; Chairman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Business, Senator Titus Zam (APC-Benue); and the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Senate, Mr Murthar Usman.

However, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was absent from the investigative hearing.

Speaking further on the alleged disorderly conduct, Senator Imaseun said:

“Ladies and gentlemen, she’s not here, now I can understand why she’s not here, she’s probably not here on the order of her lawyers, that being the case, the committee will sit and will deliberate on what we’ve gotten.

”Senators have presented their cases before us based on our rulebook and all other documents that are available to us, we shall make a decision here, and then present to the full senate,” he said.

 

 

 

 

 

Emmanuel Ukoh