The deployment of California National Guard troops to Los Angeles on Sunday to control escalating protests over federal immigration enforcement has ignited legal and political controversy. The move, ordered by the Trump administration, was sharply criticised by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who called it “unlawful” and vowed to challenge it in court.
The protests, now in their third day, were triggered by federal immigration raids in the city and have led to clashes between demonstrators and police. The Los Angeles Police Department reported over 30 arrests across the weekend. Demonstrations turned violent in some areas, with protesters hurling objects at officers, setting several autonomous vehicles ablaze, and blocking major roadways like the 101 Freeway.
In response, National Guard troops, along with the Department of Homeland Security personnel, were stationed to protect federal buildings. U.S. Northern Command confirmed the deployment of 300 Guard members to three key locations in Los Angeles, stating their role is limited to safeguarding federal personnel and infrastructure.
Despite these assurances, tensions remain high. Protesters, many waving Mexican flags, rallied at locations across the city, including outside City Hall, where the Party for Socialism and Liberation held a rally.
Governor Newsom condemned the federal order and accused President Trump of using the immigration raids to provoke unrest. “These are the acts of a dictator, not a president,” Newsom wrote on X, adding that the state would sue to block the deployment.
Police Chief Jim McDonnell acknowledged the growing unrest, stating that a reassessment of security measures may be necessary if violence continues. Meanwhile, Mayor Karen Bass blamed the federal government for inflaming the situation, though she also condemned protest-related violence.
President Trump defended the National Guard deployment under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which permits federal use of Guard troops in specific national emergencies. However, legal experts and state officials argue that Title 10 also requires coordination with state governors, casting doubt on the legality of the unilateral order.
On social media, Trump referred to protesters as violent, insurrectionist mobs, and urged law enforcement to take strong action. He stopped short of invoking the Insurrection Act but said he would consider it if the situation worsened.
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that 500 Marines at Camp Pendleton are on high alert, ready to be mobilised if needed. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the Guard’s role is to ensure safety for peaceful protesters and law enforcement.
Trump’s aggressive enforcement push has sparked legal challenges, especially from immigrant advocates who say the raids have affected even legal residents. Vanessa Cárdenas of America’s Voice accused the administration of deliberately provoking confrontation under the guise of law enforcement.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also weighed in, criticising the raids and military presence as counterproductive. “The immigration issue will not be resolved with raids or violence,” she said, urging comprehensive reform instead.
As Los Angeles braces for further unrest, questions loom about the legality and long-term impact of federal intervention in local protest dynamics.
Reuters/s.s