Liberia Passes Law Allowing Dual Citizenship
The two chambers of the Liberian Legislature amended and passed the country’s Alien and Nationality Law; legalizing dual citizenship for Liberians and people of Negro-decent.
READ ALSO: NAF To Support Armed Forces of Liberia
The bill, signed into law by President George Weah Friday and confirmed on Sunday had passed both the House of Representatives and the Senate Tuesday.
It amends the West African state’s nationality law, allowing Liberians to remain citizens after acquiring a second nationality.
Liberia — a country founded by Americans — has a significant diaspora living in the United States. An estimated 100,000 people born in Liberia lived in America between 2008 and 2012, according to US census data.
Dual citizens will, however, be barred from serving as Liberian president, finance minister or central bank governor and from holding high-level positions in national security or law enforcement.
“If such a person desires to contest (elections), the person must renounce the citizenship of the other country at least one year before applying to the National Elections Commission,” the bill reads.
Last year, a Supreme Court decision relaxed the country’s tough ban on dual citizenship, which dated back to 1973. The ban had previousy automatically stripped citizenship from holders of other passports.
The court decision did not overturn the dual citizenship ban but rather meant that a court must decide whether or not someone can be stripped of Liberian nationality.
The ban which blocked Liberians who had naturalised in the US or Europe from holding a Liberian passport had long been viewed as hypocritical in some quarters, as elite Liberians secretly held American citizenship, and have been accused of transferring money abroad.
Hundreds of thousands of other Liberians are also thought to reside overseas, having fled war and poverty.
Weah previously asked Liberians to lift the ban in a referendum in December 2020, arguing that nationality restrictions which include a ban on foreign property ownership were unfair.
Some hoped the move would propel investments in the poor nation of 4.8 million people.
Yet the proposed change failed. A majority of 51.5 percent of voters were in favour of lifting the ban, but a two-thirds majority was required.