Patent dispute: Apple to halt U.S. sales of smartwatches
Apple Inc., one of the world’s leading technology companies, has recently announced that it will temporarily halt sales of its Series 9 and Ultra 2 smartwatches in the United States.
The decision comes as the company faces a patent dispute over the technology that enables the blood oxygen feature on the said devices.
The company said it would pause sales of the watches from its website starting on Dec. 21 and from Apple retail locations after Dec. 24. Other models that do not contain the blood oxygen sensor, like Apple’s lower-priced Apple Watch SE model, are unaffected by the dispute.
In October the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an order that could bar Apple from importing its Apple Watches after finding the devices violate medical technology company Masimo’s patent rights.
Ryan Reith, program vice president for research firm IDC’s mobile device tracking efforts, said that U.S. holiday sales of Apple Watches will not suffer and that the full impact of the ruling, if it stands, will come in January and February, typically some of Apple’s slowest sales months in the U.S.
“Apple has plenty of inventory of Watch 8 and SE so they will have products available during that time.
“The bigger implication is around whether or not Apple can use the blood oxygen sensor technology that is in question on future devices, or if they’ll have to reach a settlement or come up with a new solution.” Reith said.
The court’s decision is under review by President Joe Biden until Dec. 25, but Apple said it is taking steps to comply should the ruling stand.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the part of the Biden administration handling the case, said that Ambassador Katherine Tai “is carefully considering all factors in this case.” If not vetoed, the ban would go into effect on Dec. 26.
Masimo CEO Joe Kiani told CNBC in October that he was open to negotiating a deal with Apple.
Also Read: UK: Google pushes for antitrust action against Microsoft
In a statement on Monday, Masimo said the ITC decision “should be respected, protecting intellectual property rights and maintaining public trust in the United States’ patent system and encouraging US industry.”
Apple has about a quarter of the global smartwatch market, according to Counterpoint Research. Both the Series 9 and the Ultra 2 would remain available for purchase outside of the United States, including during the Lunar New Year season in Asia.
Apple said it believes the ITC’s finding was erroneous, should be reversed and that it intends to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit.
Masimo has accused Apple of hiring away its employees, stealing its pulse oximetry technology and incorporating it into the popular Apple Watch.
A jury trial on Masimo’s allegations in California federal court ended with a mistrial in May. Apple has separately sued Masimo for patent infringement in a federal court in Delaware and has called Masimo’s legal actions a “maneuver to clear a path” for its own competing smartwatch.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejected Apple’s requests to review the validity of the patents at issue in the ITC decision earlier this year.
A presidential administration has not vetoed an ITC ruling since 2013, when President Barack Obama’s administration overturned an import ban on Apple’s iPhones and iPads from a patent dispute with Samsung.
The Biden administration in February chose not to veto a separate import ban on Apple Watches based on a patent-infringement complaint from medical technology company AliveCor. The ITC has placed the ban on hold for other reasons.
